…they are only abandoned.” I’ve heard that quote attributed to John Guare, and a number of other playwrights. It’s a great quote, whoever said it.
The art of playwriting is not to abandon the play too soon.
The re-write of my latest play was “finished” last week. “Finished” meaning there are still re-writes of this re-write to be accomplished. I’ve got two sections with some important exposition that need to be revealed more ingeniously. My friend, MBH, after he read the newest version of the play, said quite plainly, “pages 60 through 64 put me to sleep.” Ah…of course, thank you! That scene on those pages, as well as another scene, where the characters, “talk, talk, talk,” will ultimately be replaced by some, uh, drama. My goal in upcoming re-writes are to create scenes that reveal the same information in a way that keeps the audience, uh, awake and engaged in what’s happening onstage.
Eons ago, I thought re-writing meant polishing up a draft. Polishing, for those of you don’t know, is when you change a word here and there, remove a line or two, add a tiny bit of clarification to a draft. I now approach re-writing as throwing out whole chunks, sometimes all, of what I’ve already written. The main story itself remains the same. How it gets told is refined. Hopefully smarter ideas get revealed.
In the case of the current play, I had a very complicated subplot involving blackmail of the main character. I had to dump the subplot. When I first began writing the play, I thought the blackmail was necessary to answer why this man would keep a seemingly simple event a secret from his wife. After hearing the play twice, in different evolutions, it became very clear the heart of the play got diluted by the blackmail stuff going on. In taking out the subplot, everything changed between the married couple. The play is more intimate; the events more harrowing and poignant.
I just had to dig deeper into my own emotional and creative reserves to get at the characters’ truths.
I do a funny thing in my early drafts. I insert the most non-threatening reason or event or emotion. I don’t do this on purpose. It happens because sometimes I am afraid to get to the heart of the matter. A clear example is in a play I wrote about suicide. In the original version of the play, the main character is worried about her ex-girlfriend killing herself. The other characters in the play included stories about three important friends in her past who had killed themselves. In the final version, the main character must decide if she is going to join her mother, her brother and her best friend, all of whom had killed themselves. Uh…this is a rather dark comedy of sorts. At any rate, I hope you get the idea of how much more central the theme of the play became when it became much more personal to the main character. And so, in the current play, I gave the main character an out with a blackmail scheme, instead of calling his character acutely into question.
I’ve set the current play aside for a couple of weeks to work on some other pressing ideas. My hope is once I’ve re-written those expositional scenes, I will be able to “abandon” it, and it to send out into the world.
I don’t want to write the most boring non-threatening thing. It happens. When I don’t recognize it, someone else will. Hopefully, I’ll listen and write a better play.
That’s the goal, isn’t it? To write the best play possible.
Comments:
It is a great quote, but I don’t think John Guare was the first to have this notion. At best, I believe playwrights have actually co-opted it – which makes sense since it also applies to them…
However, I’ve always been told it was Hemingway who spit the idea out first.
Anyway, that’s what the story I’ve always repeated.
Malachy 2006/10/12 at 7:36 PM
Yes, I’ve heard it attributed to Hemingway, too. And perhaps before even him, Paul Valery said, “A work of art is never finished, it is abandoned.” Or was it, “A poem is never finished…?” Writers endlessly re-distributing the thought. Thanks for weighing in, Malachy!
JD 2006/10/15 at 10:02 AM